<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lumpers and Splitters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strange.corante.com/2004/07/28/lumpers-and-splitters/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strange.corante.com/2004/07/28/lumpers-and-splitters</link>
	<description>Picking out patterns in the chaos</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2004/07/28/lumpers-and-splitters#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 10:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2004/07/28/lumpers-and-splitters#comment-1521</guid>
		<description>In NLP preferred patterns of thought such as "lumping" and "splitting" are called "meta-programs" - these two are also called "sort for similarity" and "sort for difference" - they are perceptual filters that affect the way we see things. In your description there also seems to be an element of "big chunking" and "small chunking" (i.e. preference for overview or detail)

As you say, it's useful to be able to do both. And "lumpers" and "splitters" is a much handier way of describing them!

bst rgds

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In NLP preferred patterns of thought such as &#8220;lumping&#8221; and &#8220;splitting&#8221; are called &#8220;meta-programs&#8221; - these two are also called &#8220;sort for similarity&#8221; and &#8220;sort for difference&#8221; - they are perceptual filters that affect the way we see things. In your description there also seems to be an element of &#8220;big chunking&#8221; and &#8220;small chunking&#8221; (i.e. preference for overview or detail)</p>
<p>As you say, it&#8217;s useful to be able to do both. And &#8220;lumpers&#8221; and &#8220;splitters&#8221; is a much handier way of describing them!</p>
<p>bst rgds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beat waydown</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2004/07/28/lumpers-and-splitters#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>beat waydown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2004/07/28/lumpers-and-splitters#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>I'm not a lumper, but I surely ain't no splitter. I'd say I'm a sort of non-archist.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a lumper, but I surely ain&#8217;t no splitter. I&#8217;d say I&#8217;m a sort of non-archist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

