<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia vs Britannica: Yawn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strange.corante.com/2006/09/13/wikipedia-vs-britannica-yawn/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strange.corante.com/2006/09/13/wikipedia-vs-britannica-yawn</link>
	<description>Picking out patterns in the chaos</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Marks</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2006/09/13/wikipedia-vs-britannica-yawn#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2006/09/13/wikipedia-vs-britannica-yawn#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>Britannica used to be free online - back when they were upselling the CD-ROM version. They withdrew it and made it for pay thereafter, creating a niche for wikipedia.
That said, even if it were free online (as it is in libraries, after all) there is still a place for the more comprehensive and consensual work that Wikipedia is growing into. The more insidious threat to Wikipedia is the deletionist clique that deters the contributors who write most of the substantive prose.
http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowritescomments
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britannica used to be free online - back when they were upselling the CD-ROM version. They withdrew it and made it for pay thereafter, creating a niche for wikipedia.<br />
That said, even if it were free online (as it is in libraries, after all) there is still a place for the more comprehensive and consensual work that Wikipedia is growing into. The more insidious threat to Wikipedia is the deletionist clique that deters the contributors who write most of the substantive prose.<br />
<a href="http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowritescomments" rel="nofollow">http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowritescomments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2006/09/13/wikipedia-vs-britannica-yawn#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2006/09/13/wikipedia-vs-britannica-yawn#comment-2177</guid>
		<description>I almost laughed out loud when Dale Hoiberg got miffed that Jimmy Wales used text links in his repsonses.  That is what makes the Internet so great; one can easily point a web surfer to a source of information.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost laughed out loud when Dale Hoiberg got miffed that Jimmy Wales used text links in his repsonses.  That is what makes the Internet so great; one can easily point a web surfer to a source of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Phillips</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2006/09/13/wikipedia-vs-britannica-yawn#comment-2176</link>
		<dc:creator>David Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2006/09/13/wikipedia-vs-britannica-yawn#comment-2176</guid>
		<description>Oh.. how true.

I also keep running into publication that hide content behind subscriptions. Google News is just so convenient to find the free stuff.

If links are assets (yes they are) Britannica can never catch up without re-inventing itself.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh.. how true.</p>
<p>I also keep running into publication that hide content behind subscriptions. Google News is just so convenient to find the free stuff.</p>
<p>If links are assets (yes they are) Britannica can never catch up without re-inventing itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

