Ada Lovelace Day

About The Authors

Suw Charman-Anderson

Suw Charman-Anderson

Suw Charman-Anderson is a social software consultant and writer who specialises in the use of blogs and wikis behind the firewall. With a background in journalism, publishing and web design, Suw is now one of the UK’s best known bloggers, frequently speaking at conferences and seminars.

Her personal blog is Chocolate and Vodka, and yes, she’s married to Kevin.

Email Suw

Kevin Anderson

Kevin Anderson

Kevin Anderson is a freelance journalist and digital strategist with more than a decade of experience with the BBC and the Guardian. He has been a digital journalist since 1996 with experience in radio, television, print and the web. As a journalist, he uses blogs, social networks, Web 2.0 tools and mobile technology to break news, to engage with audiences and tell the story behind the headlines in multiple media and on multiple platforms.

From 2009-2010, he was the digital research editor at The Guardian where he focused on evaluating and adapting digital innovations to support The Guardian’s world-class journalism. He joined The Guardian in September 2006 as their first blogs editor after 8 years with the BBC working across the web, television and radio. He joined the BBC in 1998 to become their first online journalist outside of the UK, working as the Washington correspondent for BBCNews.com.

And, yes, he’s married to Suw.

E-mail Kevin.

Member of the Media 2.0 Workgroup
Dark Blogs Case Study

Case Study 01 - A European Pharmaceutical Group

Find out how a large pharma company uses dark blogs (behind the firewall) to gather and disseminate competitive intelligence material.


free page hit counter



hit counter script


All content © Kevin Anderson and/or Suw Charman

Interview series:
at the FASTforward blog. Amongst them: John Hagel, David Weinberger, JP Rangaswami, Don Tapscott, and many more!

Corante Blog

Friday, September 29th, 2006

SHiFT: Dannie Jost - Patents and software

Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson

Legislation was invented in the 18th century, and it’s not able to cope with the 21st century. Worked for the patent office so has a background.

Software should not be patented at all, it should be exempted at all times.

No one in the audience has a patent.
Lots of people have coded.
No one has ever applied for a patent.

Code is language, like literature, mathematic, and belongs to the domain of culture. Code is not a machine, it’s abstract, an intellectual endeavour. Usually code get packaged and is called software. It’s not physical yet it’s made physical.

Intellectual property:

copyright
- literature
- scientific
- art
- music

design 5 x 5
Patents 20 + 5
trademarks 10 yrs x X
trade secret - only good way to protect code

Why do you need to know about software patents?

Facts
1. Software is patentable in the US
2. Software is not patentable in ‘EP-land’, i.e. ‘European Patent’-land, Swiss are part of the European Patent Convention, also includes Moldavia. (Community patent does not exist yet, but it is a project.)

What is a patent?
“a title issued by a governmental entity that entitles the owner to a geographically and time limited monopoly.”

It’s a deal you do with the government. They let you have a monopoly for a limited time for a specific geographical area and your part of the deal is to disclose your invention, you publish the details.

Different types of knowledge: public domain and proprietary knowledge.

Wipo tells you what you can patent. Picks words very, very carefully - very legal domain. Have to be as exact as possible, terminology is important.

What are patentable inventions?
- new
- industrial application
- involve and inventive step, which must not be obvious to the people who know the field concerned.

Exclusions to the European Patent Convention
i.e. stuff you can’t patent
- discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods
- aesthetic creations
- schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, and programs for computers

This is just for European patents.

Patent paths. How do you get a patent?
- apply
- examination
- grant
- admin

Can file for a patent locally, or in WIPO in Geneva.

Three different groups that regulated. World patents done by PCT, in Geneva, can pick which countries you want to patent in, e.g. China, Portugal, US.

So there are software patents in Europe although they are not allowed, because through the PCT route you can get American specifications turned into European patents. This is why even if you are fully open source, fully free software, and if you are a developer or programmer and are serious about writing an application or starting a business which your intellectual capital is code, you better be aware of what is out there in terms of software patents. This is not about just filing a patent, but being aware of what is out there.

Very expensive. Not friendly to individuals, freelancers or even SMEs. Cost of the EP patent that is one of the driving forces pushing the Community Patent.

Software patents, therefore
- exist
- are enforceable
- part of the public domain

How do you find this stuff?
- open source
- publications
- expired patent applications

Sates of the art
- all publications in any language available up to the filing date.

So if you wrote your algorithm on a napkin and left it in a restaurant, that’s in the public domain. So patent then not valid as ‘novelty’ is destroyed. (Novelty can only be destroyed, it can’t be proven.)

Lots of patent databases.
Several prior art wikis.
Can also use search or metasearch like Clusty.

Email a copy of 'SHiFT: Dannie Jost - Patents and software' to a friend

EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND



Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.



Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.





E-Mail Image Verification

Loading ... Loading ...

4 Responses to “SHiFT: Dannie Jost - Patents and software”

  1. P.L.Hayes Says:

    Software (information processing) ‘inventions’ certainly are patentable at the EPO and at the Patent Offices of most individual European states. It’s got nothing to do with the PCT or “American specifications”. It is (mainly) because of the teleologically motivated and absurd* interpretation of the EPC’s “as such” clause developed over the years by the Boards of Appeal of the EPO.

    *1. The claim category of a computer-implemented method is distinguished from that of a computer program. Even though a method, in particular a method of operating a computer, may be put into practice with the help of a computer program, a claim relating to such a method does not claim a computer program in the category of a computer program (point 5.1 of the reasons).

    http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/t030424eu1.htm
    http://www.ffii.org.uk/archives/28

  2. Marco Menardi Says:

    “you better be aware of what is out there in terms of software patents”
    should be
    “you better fight software patents tentatives of introduction in Europe will all your strengths”, because if you just know that EPO has approved about 30,000 (illegal) sw patents in Europe so far, you realize that you simply have to STOP CODING and do business that have nothing to do with software. There is no escape, every (non trivial) program infringes many patents, and if you are sued, you are ruined.
    So help the fight (the current one is against EPLA proposal), also with monetary donations:
    http://www.ffii.org

  3. rattus Says:

    Many thanks for these wonderful notes. Patents, software patents in particular, are sure a twisted and delicate world on its own.

  4. Alex Gault Says:

    For anyone interested in participating in a community and broader discussion about about intellectual property and patents, you may be interested in LegalForce, an online marketplace for intellectual property that just launch in beta format this week.

    LegalForce is both a marketplace where patents can be bought, sold and licensed — and a professional network for inventors, entrepreneurs, IP professionals, attorneys and investors and anyone else interested in innovation and invention. The site includes groups, discussion boards, videos, event listings and a classified section.