Ada Lovelace Day

About The Authors

Suw Charman-Anderson

Suw Charman-Anderson

Suw Charman-Anderson is a social software consultant and writer who specialises in the use of blogs and wikis behind the firewall. With a background in journalism, publishing and web design, Suw is now one of the UK’s best known bloggers, frequently speaking at conferences and seminars.

Her personal blog is Chocolate and Vodka, and yes, she’s married to Kevin.

Email Suw

Kevin Anderson

Kevin Anderson

Kevin Anderson is a freelance journalist and digital strategist with more than a decade of experience with the BBC and the Guardian. He has been a digital journalist since 1996 with experience in radio, television, print and the web. As a journalist, he uses blogs, social networks, Web 2.0 tools and mobile technology to break news, to engage with audiences and tell the story behind the headlines in multiple media and on multiple platforms.

From 2009-2010, he was the digital research editor at The Guardian where he focused on evaluating and adapting digital innovations to support The Guardian’s world-class journalism. He joined The Guardian in September 2006 as their first blogs editor after 8 years with the BBC working across the web, television and radio. He joined the BBC in 1998 to become their first online journalist outside of the UK, working as the Washington correspondent for

And, yes, he’s married to Suw.

E-mail Kevin.

Member of the Media 2.0 Workgroup
Dark Blogs Case Study

Case Study 01 - A European Pharmaceutical Group

Find out how a large pharma company uses dark blogs (behind the firewall) to gather and disseminate competitive intelligence material.

free page hit counter

hit counter script

All content © Kevin Anderson and/or Suw Charman

Interview series:
at the FASTforward blog. Amongst them: John Hagel, David Weinberger, JP Rangaswami, Don Tapscott, and many more!

Corante Blog

Monday, February 26th, 2007

Open publishing - The opposite of open is DRM

Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson

It’s difficult to have a discussion about open publishing without also considering digital rights management (DRM), the software that attempts to control what people do with digitally distributed content. For many publishers, the thought of publishing books under a Creative Commons licence is anathema, but yet they don’t want to pass up on the opportunity to distribute their material digitally online. Instead of experimenting with open publishing, they try to find a middle way and frequently they think that middle way is to use DRM to lock up their ebooks and audiobooks.

As you can tell from my tone, I’m none too keen on DRM. It’s something I’ve done a lot of work on with the Open Rights Group, where I was until recently Executive Director. Rather than rehash all the arguments here as to why I believe DRM is bad, I’m going to give you a nice list of links:

The problem with DRM is that it’s a fundamentally flawed technology which erodes our rights and favours contract law over copyright law. It prevents users exercising their fair dealing rights (called fair use in the US), restricts access to those with disabilities, and does nothing to benefit the consumer.

I have been surprised by the relish with which some publishers approach DRM, but in looking for a middle way they’ve ended up down a cul-de-sac.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Email a copy of 'Open publishing - The opposite of open is DRM' to a friend


Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.

Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.

E-Mail Image Verification

Loading ... Loading ...

6 Responses to “Open publishing - The opposite of open is DRM”

  1. Will Says:

    I don’t think I agree that is so black and white — “the opposite of open is DRM.” Well, I hope not, anyway.

    I definitely support the right of musicans to get paid — I want them to. (It would be silly for me to drive someone out of business, if I like their “service.”)

    I don’t find iTunes DRM too restrictive — but I’ve read articles from some musicans who feel that it may restrict them in the use of sampling and loops. In today’s “new” creativity — a time of mashups and mixes, this would definitely seem to stifle things.

    One such musican:

    I just wish a standard form of DRM could be applied across all devices and all companies. That way, I could use all my music on any device.

  2. Kevin Marks Says:

    Good set of links there, Suw. I’d add my own ‘5 short arguments against DRM’:
    David Weinbergers excellent essay on why computers shouldn’t do jurispudence, ‘Copy Protection is a Crime’:

    For more recent takes on the issue, see Steve Jobs’ ‘Thoughts on Music’:
    and Daniel Eran’s ‘How FairPlay Works: Apple’s iTunes DRM Dilemma’:

  3. Renee Turner Says:

    I’m curious to hear your thoughts on Steve Jobs recent statement on DRM. What impact (if any) do you think it will have on the industry?

  4. Kevin Marks Says:

    Another great essay from Baen books on drm:

  5. Suw Says:

    Renee, I think Jobs’ recent statement on DRM will not prove to have that much impact on the industry. There’s a tension between the technology industry and the big players in the music industry, with the music industry seeing tech (including media player manufacturers, ISPs, blank media and memory mfrs, Apple, etc etc) as making money out of music “without paying for it”. This attitude was reflected in the music industry’s attempt to lobby for a ‘value recognition right’, a levy they proposed be introduced on any media which can hold or transmit music, e.g. blank CDs, memory sticks, mp3 players, and ISPs. An absurd proposal if ever I saw one, and example of their hostility.

    The more savvy music labels, like Beggars Banquet for example, are less technophobic, but in that case Jobs is preaching to the converted so they are already anti-DRM.

    We’ll have to wait and see how this plays out, but I’m not holding my breath.

  6. Suw Says:

    Will, taking an anti-DRM stance does not equate to saying that musicians - or other creative folk - shouldn’t get paid. Of course they should. I love music, and literature and all that stuff that people do for the love of it, and I totally support their right to earn money from their work. This is why I am not anti-copyright, but pro-copyright reform.

    But you have to ask if DRM really is in the best interests of musicians and writers. If DRM is stopping people from hearing your music or reading your book, is that good for building up a fanbase?

    Better than a standard DRM is no DRM - then you have full interoperability.