<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XFM: Sacrificing quality for &#8230; what, exactly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly</link>
	<description>Picking out patterns in the chaos</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2579</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2579</guid>
		<description>After hearing XFM was coming to South Wales, I thought I'd give XFM a listen - especially after friends hyped it up so much. So I sacrificed my beloved 6 music for a week to give it a fair trial.

This was a truly terrible idea. With the new XU listener playlist, I was bombarded with the same old tunes everyday and I didn't have the comfort of a nice friendly DJ giving me interesting news about the bands etc.

If the music played on the station is chosen by the listeners (and therefore music they have already heard) when does any new music get fed in? I may as well have listened to my ipod on shuffle for a week - the playlist would be much longer, with less repeats and no ads.

When they open up in South Wales and are set to continue with the XU policy here too. I wonder if they will be able to build the same sort of "indie" audience as in other places with XU being there from the start. Without a dedicated indie/alternative audience, selecting the tunes we are set to hear a load of pop pap for the foreseeable future.

I am now back listening to 6 music and it is pure joy!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After hearing XFM was coming to South Wales, I thought I&#8217;d give XFM a listen - especially after friends hyped it up so much. So I sacrificed my beloved 6 music for a week to give it a fair trial.</p>
<p>This was a truly terrible idea. With the new XU listener playlist, I was bombarded with the same old tunes everyday and I didn&#8217;t have the comfort of a nice friendly DJ giving me interesting news about the bands etc.</p>
<p>If the music played on the station is chosen by the listeners (and therefore music they have already heard) when does any new music get fed in? I may as well have listened to my ipod on shuffle for a week - the playlist would be much longer, with less repeats and no ads.</p>
<p>When they open up in South Wales and are set to continue with the XU policy here too. I wonder if they will be able to build the same sort of &#8220;indie&#8221; audience as in other places with XU being there from the start. Without a dedicated indie/alternative audience, selecting the tunes we are set to hear a load of pop pap for the foreseeable future.</p>
<p>I am now back listening to 6 music and it is pure joy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2578</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 14:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2578</guid>
		<description>hahaha, funny i found this, im a 8 hour a day listener... and this is the end of me listening to xfm, something ive been doing loyally and religiously for over 4 years.

what attracted me to xfm in the first place was its lo-key feel, there was a thriving comunity of regular listeners, i knew the djs they knew me, and it made me feel like i belonged and contributed to something good... over the years as they chase the ratings and profit its become harder and harder to feel a part of the station (afteral as listeners we are a big part of it).. the X-list was great, for an hour you got none playlist songs... but as the listener audience increased and became more mainstream so does the selection of songs... so now, you have a 6 hour x-list, controlled by people who have nothing other than mainstream tastes.

i'll be the first to admit that the actual overall playlist is more varied than it has been recently, but thats hardly surprising.... the biggest single problem is that the station is going for a bigger audience, this big audience dosnt have the same music sensabilities as me, and they aint gonna want the same music as me... or probably anyone else that really really likes.. no LOVES their indie/alt/rock music.

it will probably work for xfm, low cost output with high earning and popularity.. but in the same way MTV went, in a few years it'll be nothing more than a guitar pop station. maybe we'll have an Xfm2 for the people that actually care about new music. i dont know.

i for one wont be listening to it for another day, i need personality and soul from a station i listen to, and more importantly i need to feel i belong, Djs i can engage with.. i lived with the corporate nature xfm had, accepted the adverts and rubbish that went with it... but this is one step too far... it is impossible for me to carry on listening to something i used to actually care about, so off to radio 6 i go.

cheers dan
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha, funny i found this, im a 8 hour a day listener&#8230; and this is the end of me listening to xfm, something ive been doing loyally and religiously for over 4 years.</p>
<p>what attracted me to xfm in the first place was its lo-key feel, there was a thriving comunity of regular listeners, i knew the djs they knew me, and it made me feel like i belonged and contributed to something good&#8230; over the years as they chase the ratings and profit its become harder and harder to feel a part of the station (afteral as listeners we are a big part of it).. the X-list was great, for an hour you got none playlist songs&#8230; but as the listener audience increased and became more mainstream so does the selection of songs&#8230; so now, you have a 6 hour x-list, controlled by people who have nothing other than mainstream tastes.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ll be the first to admit that the actual overall playlist is more varied than it has been recently, but thats hardly surprising&#8230;. the biggest single problem is that the station is going for a bigger audience, this big audience dosnt have the same music sensabilities as me, and they aint gonna want the same music as me&#8230; or probably anyone else that really really likes.. no LOVES their indie/alt/rock music.</p>
<p>it will probably work for xfm, low cost output with high earning and popularity.. but in the same way MTV went, in a few years it&#8217;ll be nothing more than a guitar pop station. maybe we&#8217;ll have an Xfm2 for the people that actually care about new music. i dont know.</p>
<p>i for one wont be listening to it for another day, i need personality and soul from a station i listen to, and more importantly i need to feel i belong, Djs i can engage with.. i lived with the corporate nature xfm had, accepted the adverts and rubbish that went with it&#8230; but this is one step too far&#8230; it is impossible for me to carry on listening to something i used to actually care about, so off to radio 6 i go.</p>
<p>cheers dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suw</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2577</link>
		<dc:creator>Suw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 13:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2577</guid>
		<description>You make a good point - DJs will always be a matter of personal taste, and one man's meat is another man's poison. But I'd rather have Xfm search for really talented DJs than cut them out of daytime radio all together, even if they picked DJs that I wasn't crazy over.

As it happens, I'm not crazy over Tonks, Marsha or Graeme Smith, but I'd rather them than an automated system. Sucks the soul out if it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a good point - DJs will always be a matter of personal taste, and one man&#8217;s meat is another man&#8217;s poison. But I&#8217;d rather have Xfm search for really talented DJs than cut them out of daytime radio all together, even if they picked DJs that I wasn&#8217;t crazy over.</p>
<p>As it happens, I&#8217;m not crazy over Tonks, Marsha or Graeme Smith, but I&#8217;d rather them than an automated system. Sucks the soul out if it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark O in London</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark O in London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 13:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2576</guid>
		<description>SUW- We do differ, I dig Camfield, but I've always found Messrs Bacon, Baker and Greening to be complete turn-offs (especially Bacon and Baker). Last I heard of Greening, he was at Smooth FM, featuring AC tunes much better suited to his style. Anyway, I'm happy you're devoting this space to Xfm, a favourite topic of mine as well. In my view, the best breakfast host Xfm ever had was the first one, Eric Hodge, a chap who focused strictly on great music, with no hype.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUW- We do differ, I dig Camfield, but I&#8217;ve always found Messrs Bacon, Baker and Greening to be complete turn-offs (especially Bacon and Baker). Last I heard of Greening, he was at Smooth FM, featuring AC tunes much better suited to his style. Anyway, I&#8217;m happy you&#8217;re devoting this space to Xfm, a favourite topic of mine as well. In my view, the best breakfast host Xfm ever had was the first one, Eric Hodge, a chap who focused strictly on great music, with no hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suw</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>Suw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 12:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>Rachel: You'll be ok - Ian Camfield is staying. The DJ-free zone is from 10 til 4.

Tom/Mark: This is where we differ. I like DJs as a concept. I love having a human voice intermingled with the music, and a talented DJ is a real boon to any radio station. Ian Camfield and Iain Baker were always two of my favourites, along with Kevin Greening and, latterly, even Richard Bacon. Getting rid of good DJs and replacing them with mediocre ones was a really bad move, but perhaps Xfm were prepping us for the day that they ditch them completely.

Good DJs are important to me - they give shape to my day as they change shifts, they make me laugh, they remind me I'm not alone even though I work on my own. My iPod can't do that for me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel: You&#8217;ll be ok - Ian Camfield is staying. The DJ-free zone is from 10 til 4.</p>
<p>Tom/Mark: This is where we differ. I like DJs as a concept. I love having a human voice intermingled with the music, and a talented DJ is a real boon to any radio station. Ian Camfield and Iain Baker were always two of my favourites, along with Kevin Greening and, latterly, even Richard Bacon. Getting rid of good DJs and replacing them with mediocre ones was a really bad move, but perhaps Xfm were prepping us for the day that they ditch them completely.</p>
<p>Good DJs are important to me - they give shape to my day as they change shifts, they make me laugh, they remind me I&#8217;m not alone even though I work on my own. My iPod can&#8217;t do that for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark O in London</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2574</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark O in London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 12:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2574</guid>
		<description>More music, and a corresponding reduction in boring DJ chit chat and phone-in contests, will probably have a positive impact on Xfm's less-than-impressive ratings. It's a programming policy that has worked well for stations in the US with the alternative format. Xfm's performance has generally mirrored the results of similar stations in the States so the chances of success are good. Don't be such a pessimist!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More music, and a corresponding reduction in boring DJ chit chat and phone-in contests, will probably have a positive impact on Xfm&#8217;s less-than-impressive ratings. It&#8217;s a programming policy that has worked well for stations in the US with the alternative format. Xfm&#8217;s performance has generally mirrored the results of similar stations in the States so the chances of success are good. Don&#8217;t be such a pessimist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachel</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2573</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2573</guid>
		<description>And here I was thinking how great it was to be able to listen to Ian Camfield on my way home from work. :( Looks like I'll be defecting to Radio 1. Bah.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here I was thinking how great it was to be able to listen to Ian Camfield on my way home from work. <img src='http://strange.corante.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> Looks like I&#8217;ll be defecting to Radio 1. Bah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Brown</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2572</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2572</guid>
		<description>I'm afraid we've seen all this before when the marketing people got hold of GLR.

Fight the good fight but these people think they "know best", so when it's over grit your teeth and move over to 6Music.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid we&#8217;ve seen all this before when the marketing people got hold of GLR.</p>
<p>Fight the good fight but these people think they &#8220;know best&#8221;, so when it&#8217;s over grit your teeth and move over to 6Music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Morris</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2571</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/05/23/xfm-sacrificing-quality-for-what-exactly#comment-2571</guid>
		<description>I've given it up altogether. iPod + RSS with enclosures seems to give me all that radio might give me, just without ads, annoying DJs or any of the other irritants that mar almost all radio stations.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve given it up altogether. iPod + RSS with enclosures seems to give me all that radio might give me, just without ads, annoying DJs or any of the other irritants that mar almost all radio stations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

