<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging is like sex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/08/blogging-is-like-sex/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/08/blogging-is-like-sex</link>
	<description>Picking out patterns in the chaos</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/08/blogging-is-like-sex#comment-2586</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/08/blogging-is-like-sex#comment-2586</guid>
		<description>Thank you for a brilliant and thought-provoking piece. But forgive me, I do have a little trouble with the following. :)

"The bottom line is that blogging is like sex. You can't fake it."

I can't be the only woman smiling a little at this!

All the very best to you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a brilliant and thought-provoking piece. But forgive me, I do have a little trouble with the following. <img src='http://strange.corante.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
&#8220;The bottom line is that blogging is like sex. You can&#8217;t fake it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t be the only woman smiling a little at this!</p>
<p>All the very best to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Monck</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/08/blogging-is-like-sex#comment-2585</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Monck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 20:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/08/blogging-is-like-sex#comment-2585</guid>
		<description>It takes a lot of work to make your blog a lonely place!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes a lot of work to make your blog a lonely place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Flowers</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/08/blogging-is-like-sex#comment-2584</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Flowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/08/blogging-is-like-sex#comment-2584</guid>
		<description>Great article.  You're absolutely right about the drive and passion required - not just in blogging but in pretty much everything you want to succeed at.

And it's an interesting point you address about the drive for a socially driven publication. The old world writer/journalist doesn't necessarily want feed back. I listened to a story on NPR this morning about a fan of JD Salinger's that went to meet the author at his home. The fan realized that Salinger was a recluse, and when he asked the writer about his success with "Catcher in the Rye," he replied that it had been a "nightmare."  It ended with Salinger making it very clear that he didn't want the man at his home.

Journalists have largely been this way too.  They write their articles, the public reads them, and the editor deals with the occasional feedback.

It's that type of writer that doesn't fit into the world of blogging, where the readers have the ability to interact with the writer on a person to person scale.

It will be interesting to see how this head-butting, between conventional journalists and the emerging field of bloggers, will end.

Thanks for the insight and ideas.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  You&#8217;re absolutely right about the drive and passion required - not just in blogging but in pretty much everything you want to succeed at.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s an interesting point you address about the drive for a socially driven publication. The old world writer/journalist doesn&#8217;t necessarily want feed back. I listened to a story on NPR this morning about a fan of JD Salinger&#8217;s that went to meet the author at his home. The fan realized that Salinger was a recluse, and when he asked the writer about his success with &#8220;Catcher in the Rye,&#8221; he replied that it had been a &#8220;nightmare.&#8221;  It ended with Salinger making it very clear that he didn&#8217;t want the man at his home.</p>
<p>Journalists have largely been this way too.  They write their articles, the public reads them, and the editor deals with the occasional feedback.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s that type of writer that doesn&#8217;t fit into the world of blogging, where the readers have the ability to interact with the writer on a person to person scale.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how this head-butting, between conventional journalists and the emerging field of bloggers, will end.</p>
<p>Thanks for the insight and ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

