<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0: Stowe Boyd - Social = Me First</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/19/enterprise-20-stowe-boyd-social-me-first/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/19/enterprise-20-stowe-boyd-social-me-first</link>
	<description>Picking out patterns in the chaos</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Suw</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/19/enterprise-20-stowe-boyd-social-me-first#comment-2612</link>
		<dc:creator>Suw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/19/enterprise-20-stowe-boyd-social-me-first#comment-2612</guid>
		<description>I think the redefining of value in terms of happiness, working with good people, etc. is a long way off for most companies, which is a shame. Even admitting that the individual has an identity outside of the corporate is a struggle for many, who still see employees as assets/liabilities. I with more companies focused even some efforts on creating a good environment within which to work, because there is plenty of evidence to show that happy people are more productive (win/win), but we suffer from a damaged work ethos - a painful hangover from the industrial revolution.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the redefining of value in terms of happiness, working with good people, etc. is a long way off for most companies, which is a shame. Even admitting that the individual has an identity outside of the corporate is a struggle for many, who still see employees as assets/liabilities. I with more companies focused even some efforts on creating a good environment within which to work, because there is plenty of evidence to show that happy people are more productive (win/win), but we suffer from a damaged work ethos - a painful hangover from the industrial revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Cannon</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/19/enterprise-20-stowe-boyd-social-me-first#comment-2611</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/19/enterprise-20-stowe-boyd-social-me-first#comment-2611</guid>
		<description>This all changes when the definition of costs and profit changes.  "Making money" is the mechanomorph's crippled vocabulary for D-realm mechanics.  In the B-realm, cost and profit are re-defined in terms of value.  E.g. "What would you pay to work with nice people?"

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This all changes when the definition of costs and profit changes.  &#8220;Making money&#8221; is the mechanomorph&#8217;s crippled vocabulary for D-realm mechanics.  In the B-realm, cost and profit are re-defined in terms of value.  E.g. &#8220;What would you pay to work with nice people?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tripp Fenderson</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/19/enterprise-20-stowe-boyd-social-me-first#comment-2610</link>
		<dc:creator>Tripp Fenderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/06/19/enterprise-20-stowe-boyd-social-me-first#comment-2610</guid>
		<description>There's a lot to digest here. I'll have to read this post again tomorrow when I'm fresh.

I'm happy to see that some social sites recognize that I have a digital life elsewhere and the real value of their service is allowing me to bring certain aspects of that life into the connections their sites help forge.

I continue to not understand why companies insist on building "the mother of all social networking applications" instead of letting customers decide how and what aspects of their lives to share.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot to digest here. I&#8217;ll have to read this post again tomorrow when I&#8217;m fresh.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to see that some social sites recognize that I have a digital life elsewhere and the real value of their service is allowing me to bring certain aspects of that life into the connections their sites help forge.</p>
<p>I continue to not understand why companies insist on building &#8220;the mother of all social networking applications&#8221; instead of letting customers decide how and what aspects of their lives to share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

