<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s get ready to rumble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble</link>
	<description>Picking out patterns in the chaos</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Anderson</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble#comment-2687</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble#comment-2687</guid>
		<description>Paul,

A couple of things, I think that news organisations generally haven't accepted their responsibility in setting the tone of the debates and discussions they create. When things go wrong, they externalise and put all of the responsibility onto the 'users'. They rarely ask themselves if they built a boxing ring for people to fight in.

As for RNV, I think there are other solutions that get most of the benefits of real names in terms of responsibility but forego the costs. There are systems that help build identity and trust online that aren't necessarily tied to real names. But you're right, if you help provide people with an online identity that they feel a stake in, it will help curb excessively aggressive behaviour.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>A couple of things, I think that news organisations generally haven&#8217;t accepted their responsibility in setting the tone of the debates and discussions they create. When things go wrong, they externalise and put all of the responsibility onto the &#8216;users&#8217;. They rarely ask themselves if they built a boxing ring for people to fight in.</p>
<p>As for RNV, I think there are other solutions that get most of the benefits of real names in terms of responsibility but forego the costs. There are systems that help build identity and trust online that aren&#8217;t necessarily tied to real names. But you&#8217;re right, if you help provide people with an online identity that they feel a stake in, it will help curb excessively aggressive behaviour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Coletti</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Coletti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>There's one simple argument to stopping online debates turning into fight club and that's Real Name Verification. Just check out Amazon. Since they introduced this there's been a wonderful 2-phase reversal of trollness: 1) contributions are 'nice' then 2) people start to become proud of their RNV tag which in turn makes others want to do it.

the down side to RNV? The hideous, horrendous cost of implementing it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s one simple argument to stopping online debates turning into fight club and that&#8217;s Real Name Verification. Just check out Amazon. Since they introduced this there&#8217;s been a wonderful 2-phase reversal of trollness: 1) contributions are &#8216;nice&#8217; then 2) people start to become proud of their RNV tag which in turn makes others want to do it.</p>
<p>the down side to RNV? The hideous, horrendous cost of implementing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Anderson</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble#comment-2685</guid>
		<description>Martin, didn't I actually write something for that? No one commented on my post, which I actually took to be a compliment at the time. ;)

I think some folks just go for loads of comments because it's dead easy. Little investment.

What I don't get is how editors think that generating loads of traffic with highly corrosive shouting matches makes a good commercial strategy. Traffic good. Yes. But advertisers get very nervous around angry discussions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, didn&#8217;t I actually write something for that? No one commented on my post, which I actually took to be a compliment at the time. <img src='http://strange.corante.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I think some folks just go for loads of comments because it&#8217;s dead easy. Little investment.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t get is how editors think that generating loads of traffic with highly corrosive shouting matches makes a good commercial strategy. Traffic good. Yes. But advertisers get very nervous around angry discussions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>When I saw that I had a horrible flashback to AOL's /discuss campaign (which I was rather familiar with at the time).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw that I had a horrible flashback to AOL&#8217;s /discuss campaign (which I was rather familiar with at the time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2007/08/06/lets-get-ready-to-rumble#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>"I can hear editors saying that Iâ€™m advocating bland conversations"

Aargh! Make it stop!

I was having exactly the same argument on Usenet ten years ago*. All that's changed since then is that the people advocating troll-toleration are actually in charge. I guess some people really aren't bothered about the difference between signal and noise - to them it's all good traffic.

*E.g. this post from comp.software.year-2000:
http://tinyurl.com/2pbvp8
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can hear editors saying that Iâ€™m advocating bland conversations&#8221;</p>
<p>Aargh! Make it stop!</p>
<p>I was having exactly the same argument on Usenet ten years ago*. All that&#8217;s changed since then is that the people advocating troll-toleration are actually in charge. I guess some people really aren&#8217;t bothered about the difference between signal and noise - to them it&#8217;s all good traffic.</p>
<p>*E.g. this post from comp.software.year-2000:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2pbvp8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2pbvp8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

