<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How right/wrong are my futures matrices?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strange.corante.com/2009/06/05/how-rightwrong-are-my-futures-matrices/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strange.corante.com/2009/06/05/how-rightwrong-are-my-futures-matrices</link>
	<description>Picking out patterns in the chaos</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: FutureGov &#187; Useful links &#187; links for 2009-06-09</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2009/06/05/how-rightwrong-are-my-futures-matrices#comment-6226</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureGov &#187; Useful links &#187; links for 2009-06-09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2009/06/05/how-rightwrong-are-my-futures-matrices#comment-6226</guid>
		<description>[...] Strange Attractor » Blog Archive » How right/wrong are my futures matrices? Future of social media? (tags: social media blog future) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Strange Attractor » Blog Archive » How right/wrong are my futures matrices? Future of social media? (tags: social media blog future) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suw Charman-Anderson</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2009/06/05/how-rightwrong-are-my-futures-matrices#comment-6208</link>
		<dc:creator>Suw Charman-Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2009/06/05/how-rightwrong-are-my-futures-matrices#comment-6208</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, Jonathan - that's unsurprising, but good to see evidence!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Jonathan - that&#8217;s unsurprising, but good to see evidence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social networking: beyond the silo &#124; Ben Werdmuller</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2009/06/05/how-rightwrong-are-my-futures-matrices#comment-6207</link>
		<dc:creator>Social networking: beyond the silo &#124; Ben Werdmuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2009/06/05/how-rightwrong-are-my-futures-matrices#comment-6207</guid>
		<description>[...] the future of social networking on the web is hard. However, I believe that as general open social technologies develop and become more commonplace, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the future of social networking on the web is hard. However, I believe that as general open social technologies develop and become more commonplace, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Lister</title>
		<link>http://strange.corante.com/2009/06/05/how-rightwrong-are-my-futures-matrices#comment-6204</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Lister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strange.corante.com/2009/06/05/how-rightwrong-are-my-futures-matrices#comment-6204</guid>
		<description>I am interested in relationships-attention box. It's a fascinating question how the array of social tools we now have change the way we interact with people.

Some recent research (covered in the Economist - http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13176775) shows that even though tools like Facebook give us the ability to interact with hundreds and possibly thousands of people, most of us will stick to well established patterns - a light connection to around 150 people and strong connections to a handful.

This natural tendency to socialise as if we were still pack animals suggests questions, such as how best to organise yourself if you want to care about maintaining a large network of contacts, or whether massively social applications or devices could be optimized around this tendency.


J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in relationships-attention box. It&#8217;s a fascinating question how the array of social tools we now have change the way we interact with people.</p>
<p>Some recent research (covered in the Economist - <a href="http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13176775" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13176775</a>) shows that even though tools like Facebook give us the ability to interact with hundreds and possibly thousands of people, most of us will stick to well established patterns - a light connection to around 150 people and strong connections to a handful.</p>
<p>This natural tendency to socialise as if we were still pack animals suggests questions, such as how best to organise yourself if you want to care about maintaining a large network of contacts, or whether massively social applications or devices could be optimized around this tendency.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

