Monday, January 21st, 2008
Why make the effort to create social media?
Mass media focuses on promotion and creating a media experience that will attract the greatest audience. Social media focuses on building a community with an audience that has the greatest connection with not only the media, but also with the creators of that media and each other.
For many in mass media, efforts beyond mere marketing seem to be a waste of time. The connection of social media seems a waste of time and effort. Why worry about connecting with the audience when the goal is create the biggest audience for advertisers?
With so many media and entertainment choices, audiences have become less loyal. Channel surfing has become the norm, and mass audiences more difficult to deliver, just ask the music industry. In part, I think that people realise that they had become just ‘eyeballs for advertisers’ in the age of mass media. But somehow as mass media became disconnected from their audiences, they forgot some of the lessons of the past that well could point to the future and social media.
As Steve Yelvington says in remembering Mike Royko, the great Chicago columnist, and one of the only reasons that I read the Chicago Tribune:
Is Royko relevant in the 21st century? I think there’s much the aspiring blog-centric journalist can learn from the writings of Chicago’s voice of the people, the man who almost singlehandedly carried the old Chicago Daily News for years, the man who sold more newspapers than anyone who sat in any publisher’s office in the city of broad shoulders.
Today’s J-student should understand that the task is not to get a job and draw a paycheck, but rather to build a following. Learn from Royko.
Build a following and a community by breaking the fourth wall of the Fourth Estate. We need to reconnect to our audiences and our communities. In a must read post, Robert Patterson sums up how social tools like Twitter can not only help build this sense of community but also break some of the limitations of linear media like radio.
From this small beginning Laura talked to others and the “Diner” started to emerge. … The listener started to become part of the show - not in air - but with the crew. As they did stuff on air, they got not just feedback but stimulation and vice versa.
“Radio is a linear medium” Laura reminded me. “You have to listen to the end to get what we do. Twitter with its short form - enables us to introduce short cuts”. From my part it introduces the many to many while the one to many is still going. This I think is the future if Radio and TV. To wrap the Program with a society.
I think it is also the future of newspapers, which is really just a forgotten lesson of newspapers’ past. Build a following, a community, and you’ll build your business.







January 21st, 2008 at 5:36 am
Great post. Really easy for traditional marketers who are disconnected with their audience and consumers to say.
I also hear a lot about what if this social media thing is just a passing fad, part of the bubble?
Why bother then?
Seems like an excuse to not really get in touch with your audience. I really like how after the Internet has been around, it is bringing us back to a local level.
The World Wide Web is bringing us closer.
January 23rd, 2008 at 2:15 pm
Well said, yay! Embrace and accept the transparency of it all, too. If your prime purpose is “creating audience” or “selling”, it is nearly impossible to hide that, unless you are very, very, very clever.
Yet I am not sure Royko set out to or wrote under the umbrella of a goal to “build a following” - he wrote from passion, because he had something burning to express or share.
January 23rd, 2008 at 6:51 pm
Alan,
Thanks for the comment.
I agree that Royko didn’t go out there to build a following. It was just Royko being Royko. But he did authenticity before it became cool. As Woody Guthrie said, write what you know, and Royko did that. Also, I think he also wrote in a way so foreign to so many columnists in that he didn’t talk down to his audience. He was part of the city.
January 26th, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Good points, Kevin (and Kim & Alan). The issue of transparency - not only of process, but of purpose - is certainly a key challenge for many in the mainstream media, particularly as the convenient ruse of the so-called ‘Chinese Wall’ between advertising and editorial activities has been (irrevocably) breached.